As I look at the similarities and differences between how I
evaluated myself as a communicator and how others (My Husband) and (My
father-in-law) evaluated me I was somewhat discouraged at the way my “Verbal
Aggressiveness Scale” Point score. I thought I was in the Low level stage as
trying to remain respectful of others and viewpoints but my score showed to be
in the high level which leads me to believe that I often “attack” and “ridicule”
others and not consider their viewpoints. I may think to attack and ridicule
viewpoints but to be honest I try and remain considerate and not actually be
verbally aggressive unless I’m upset and find myself in a disagreement with
someone (most likely my husband) or my 6 year old daughter (that sometimes has
a hard time listening and wants to make her own decisions when I tell her to do
something). As far as my communication anxiety score I scored myself higher
than my communicators. I see myself as having a moderate level of communicating
anxiety and take precautions when speaking with people whereas my communicators
both placed me in the Mild level of anxiety which shows that I’m a confident
communicator. The one thing that
surprised me the most is the fact that my listening style profile group
remained the same. All in the level of group one. It’s nice to see that they
believe I’m a people oriented person and often build relationships with others.
I do agree with the description about remaining very trusting of other people
and this could be a slight downfall, which is one of the insights I gained from
this assessment. I believe that I trust others as I would want them to trust me
and if I don’t receive the same amount of trust back or find myself in a situation
of mistrust. I become less of a communicator. I would like to share my blog
with a few of my colleagues and ask that you post comments of your thoughts I
greatly appreciate them. Thanks!
Saturday, November 23, 2013
Friday, November 15, 2013
Cultural Diversity And Communication
As I consider the many traits of culture surrounding
me around my family, church/family friends and co-workers both civilian and
military I honestly find myself communicating slightly different. I have a
diverse background of cultures of African American and Pilipino. My husband is
Native American, and my Brother and Sister in law are Caucasian and Vietnamese. My co-workers are from different parts of the
world including Japan, Argentina, Philippines, Korea, Mexico and some of my
friends include people from Jamaica. I
communicate differently based on the comfort level and the environmental
setting I come in contact with. (Those that are a part of my communication
circle) For example, the way I communicate with a Captain (military personnel
that holds the position of a leader) at work while wearing the uniform will be
slightly different if I were to have lunch with her in civilian clothing at a
public restaurant. Also another example would be talking to my (Baptist) church
family. When I great my pastor and discuss issues and questions that are
happening within my life the answer most likely involves prayer and faith even
though in theory sometimes I think the pastor has “all the answers” I have to
word things differently to make sure I’m being respectful towards the pastor as
well as the situation. Subconsciously I know I’m unable to just bluntly say
what I want to a pastor. As work around many different cultures at work I come
into contact with several people that have different religious cultural
backgrounds as well as talking different languages to one another. I speak with
them respectfully but also am mindful about their background so I’m not
offensive. For example a few weeks ago I spoke with a co-worker from Argentina
who expressed her concern about her daughter dating someone outside of her
religion (catholic). She asked me what this particular belief meant and I was
completely honest with her and told her I wasn’t sure but to do some research on
her computer. Based on what she found she disagreed with her daughter’s
boyfriend’s belief. We had a discussion on different beliefs and I told her “Well,
you are the mom and if you do not agree with your daughter’s boyfriend’s belief
then you should speak to her.” I felt she was venting to me as well as asking
me “why this and why that? And this is what I believe and this is what his
belief should be” I continued to be respectful as possible trying not to impose
on her daughter’s choice of a boyfriend but I kept on letting her know to talk
to her daughter if she was uncomfortable with it.
From
what I learned this week about communication the three strategies I would like
to use is to be an effective communicator is to first be a little more
understanding of each person’s communication context whether it be (background,
gender, beliefs and age). Next strategy is to not only gain more knowledge of
the people I’m communicating with but be mindful of verbal as well as
non-verbal cues people display as they communicate with me. And the last
strategy I want to work on to be an effective communicator is to be an active
listener. I believe the hardest part of my communication is being an effective
listener. I will be honest and say a great majority of the time I speak to
other people I’m a bit selfish about the other person giving them their full
blown attention to me and listening to my issues rather than me listening to
them and helping them with their situations too.
Sunday, November 10, 2013
FAMILY COMMUNICATION
For this particular assignment I chose to watch a
show that I’ve never seen before it is called “BLUE BLOODS” my husband
apparently records this show and enjoys watching each episode. He told me that
this is a drama show about the New York Police Department and a majority of the
New York Police officers are siblings and the Chief of Police is literally the
biological father. He told me it is a key component to the story.
Based
on the way the characters in the story were communicating as (I watched the story in silence)
I felt each person in the story were friends. I saw
mutual communication happening in the story. I assumed each character had a
mutual relationship. I only saw towards the end of the episode a male and
female share a hug and kissing each other. I thought maybe a few characters
that were in the story were not in a relationship and were angry with each
other. It seemed as if they were arguing because their mouths were wide open as
they talked. And there eyebrows were down and scrunched up. I saw a few males
quickly walk into a room and storm out. I also saw several characters take a
deep breath after talking with one another.
I made a few
assumptions while watching the episode in silence. I assumed there was a
relationship between this woman and man because this woman kept talking to this
man who was sitting in an office chair and that maybe they had a relationship
and now going through a divorce I felt she might have been an ex-wife because
there was another gentleman in the room with glasses that I assumed to be a
lawyer.
The next assumption was of a man and woman working with
each other as friends but it seemed the man wanted to date this woman (police
officer) because he smiled each time he spoke to her and she smiled talking to
him also. Later in the episode they met each other at a bar
The last assumption was a relationship between a
different man and woman because the man ended up saving her at the end because
the suspect held up a hostage situation in the courtroom and by the look on his
face getting down on his knees looking and pleading to the suspect to let her
go was heartfelt.
Now watching the episode with sound
Each
of my assumptions was stomped as I watched the episode with sound. With the
first assumption of the man sitting in the office chair having a relationship
with the woman standing at the office door and the man with glasses being a
lawyer was almost right. The man with glasses was a lawyer but not a divorce
lawyer he was a representative of discussing information between the NYPD and
the media. The woman at the door was his office assistant just giving her
opinion on the situation.
The second assumption about the man wanting to date
the police woman was correct. I however saw that the relationship will stay
mutual because the man and woman are “partners in the police force” and they
didn’t express any physical affection towards each other.
And the last assumption about the man having feelings
for the woman being held hostage by the suspect was stomped because they were
not husband and wife they were brother and sister. The man pleaded for the
suspect to let her go because they were family. That moment surprised me and I
should have took into consideration what my husband said at the beginning that
the man sitting in the office chair is the chief of police. I thought only his
sons were part of the police department. Not knowing that his daughter was also
a lawyer working in the city.
Overall
I believe my assumptions would have been more correct if I had been watching
and learning about the show well. I learned communication between people is difficult
to read especially when the relationship between each character is not known.
It helps me to believe when working with children and families the importance
of building not only personal relationships with the children and each child
but meaningful relationships in which to understand each child and families
situation a little better. This way early childhood professionals are displaying
concern and flexibility to meet the need of the family.
Sunday, November 3, 2013
Displays of Great Communication
The first person I think about when it comes to displaying
great communication is my good friend and co-worker. (I will call her Toni)
When I first met Toni I just got hired onto the before and after school program
as an assistant. Toni immediately displayed many characteristics of an active
person. She was always smiling and having friendly conversations with children
and their families. I also observed her personal interactions with children and
saw how every child that attended the program responded with an excitement to
see Ms. Toni as she walked into the room. I was drawn to her immediately and subconsciously
followed her throughout the program. I liked how excited her facial expressions
were when a child would come up to her to show her a project they completed.
What really caught my attention is how silly she would be with the children and
how easily she handled defiant and sometimes difficult children. A few days
later I discovered that Toni is a military wife, mother and owned a home
business. I also found out that she had been working at the program as well as
having a second job at the school as a recess monitor off and on for 5 years.
She then welcomed me into her home and I met her two beautiful girls and
husband. I saw her prepare dinner for her family and then jump on the computer
to maintain her home business. Toni then invited me to watch her host and set
up a booth at an event to support military spouses. I watched her invite
clients with her friendly character, eye contact and subtle promoting ability.
She was always available when customers needed her and I even accompanied her
when she would personally deliver her product to customers. I found all her positive
characteristics as an effective tool (In my opinion everything she did to help
children and families either at home, school and personal life had a personal meaning)
I saw quality with her relationships and I thought to myself “WOW” how does she
do it? To make a long story short throughout the time I spent working with her
and getting to be close friends. I felt Toni set a high standard for
multitasking women and encouraged me to model some of her behaviors and
communication skills. I admit when Toni moved to a different location I tried
following a bit in her footsteps and they were BIG shoes to fill. I filled some
areas but not others.
Saturday, August 18, 2012
One Hope When Considering Children and Families (By Ms. Jay)
Throughout this course I believe I
learned several perspectives on diversity equity and social justice. When I
start to consider early childhood education, the community, children and families
I hope and envision a world not only accepting differences between people and
children but also recognizing the fact that discrimination, prejudices and
other forms of micro-aggressions exist.
I hope that as an educational professional I can begin to teach (or advocate)
for social justice not just inside the classroom but also with co-workers and
people I interact with daily (in the community.) I know I may not have all the
answers but I most certainly will continue to learn and be excited about
diversity, different cultures and reflect on my progress in order to improve
personally and professionally. The number one goal I would like to set for the
early childhood field related to issues of diversity, equity and social justice
is to see the field change for good. And by change I mean change perspectives,
change attitudes, change teaching methods, change activities, change
professionally, change personally, in order to celebrate diversity, equity
until finally eliminating discrimination and any form of micro-aggressions happening
around the world. So that our children, the next generation can live, learn,
work and play peacefully. I know this
goal can take many years to accomplish, but I believe we can do it!
I want to take some time out to say
thank you! To all my colleagues that participated in sharing their comments,
insights, and personal stories with me including blog and discussion posts. I greatly
appreciate them and they helped me personally and professionally. To professor
Ferrari, Thank you for all the hard work (with comments towards course work) in
helping my understandings throughout this class. I wish all my colleagues the
best as we continue our educational journey.
Saturday, August 11, 2012
A warm welcome to a child and family from Turkey (Ms. Jay)
As a caregiver working at a child development center I imagine
having the responsibility (and being the point of contact) of preparing to
welcome a new child and family from Turkey into an early childhood development
center. With first, having feelings of nervousness and excitement at the same time.
The best way I would prepare for this family (and considering what I learned
from this course) involves creating a “Supporting Families Checklist” and on
the other hand a personal culturally responsive checklist.”
(Please read through my checklist and share some of your
thoughts.)
Key
Ways
|
Supporting Families Checklist
(How am I Supporting Immigrant
Families?)
|
Personally Culturally
Responsive
(How
am I being culturally responsive?)
|
1)
Research
|
Considering proper greetings as a way of
establishing respect
|
Familiarize myself with the
culture and language of Turkey
|
2)
Learn
|
Learning some
familiar or basic Turkish Language is a way of establishing common
communication supporting both parties whether in a form of letters (in
writing) or a translator One example
maybe a translated packet on the parents sharing the child and family “likes”
and “dislikes” traditions, values, beliefs etc.
|
As I learn the
language and establish a common form of communication between myself, the
child and family members in the form of having a program translator, (translated documents)in a form
of writing or translating coming directly from the child I’m attempting to bring a warm and welcoming
environment for both the child as well as the parent/guardian.
|
3)
Consider
|
The history of
immigrant families and views of other professionals to provide families to
adjust to new culture
|
As I consider by Derman-Sparks,L.,& Edwards, J.O. (2010) "the history of immigrant families and the views of others as well as challenges with
other professionals, I can understand the views of immigrant families and
provide “enough time for children and families to adjust to unfamiliar
cultures and lifestyles” (p.74) as well as my personal adjustment to the
child and program structure
|
4)
Apply
|
By applying
these (Key Ways) within the program I support the family with hopes of
maintaining respect and common courtesy within both cultures.
|
By applying
each (key ways) method within the program and socially interacting with the
child and family maintaining a positive relationship.
|
5)
Evaluate
|
By consistently
responding to the child and family along with communication and observation I
can support the family by asking them to share their concerns/goals for their
child attending the program. Then consider their views and also evaluate/
alter activities so the needs of the child/family are met.
|
By constantly
asking for feedback from the family, I’m able to evaluate my progress as a
caregiver and keep record of the events and share my experience with other
professionals.
|
(Overall I struggled with this post
because I felt many of the key ways to support immigrant families blended together.)
The three ways I hoped my methods benefited the family from Turkey was that our porgram
established a warm, welcome, safe and comfortable environment for the child. That the interactions between the caregivers, other staff members and the family were positive. And I hoped the family felt that our program helped them
gain as well as built trust, and mutual respect for both parties. I also hoped the program supported
their needs in regards to feeling their cultural values, beliefs etc. were
important and valued despite differences.
Derman-Sparks, L., & Edwards, J. O. (2010). Anti-bias
education for young children and ourselves. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young
Children (NAEYC).
Saturday, August 4, 2012
Having to Witness Personal Biases (Ms. Jay)
I remember watching several films about diverse people and
many aspects of “Living-isms” Such as Racism, sexism and classism. Some films
with stereotypes were made to make people laugh (commedians) and others to grasp different
perspectives of diverse people with life changing events involving interracial
relationships, and relationships between men and women in general. Each film
helped me realize stereotypes exist in society and how people react to them. However,
one film that touched me recently was called “Skin”
This story is about a
young girl growing up with white parents. I didn't read the synopsis of the story I just put the movie on and watched it. When I saw the child, my first thought was ok, not a problem she was adopted but I was mistaken. Sandra (the young girl) was born with a slightly darker skin
color than her parents. On the outside of her identity society classified her as a “black child” The film shows her struggling
with her identity and where she fits in society. I will include video of the
movie trailer because it explains her life story better.
Please watch the trailer
Surprisingly The film was also based on a true story. Towards the end of the movie there are clips of the real Sandra. (I will not spoil the film for anyone who has not seen it)
After watching the film ( contributing to this assignment) I believe it diminishes equity because people were not accepting of the fact that the child belonged and was born into a family. Society was looking at skin color instead of the child and considering the child's emotions and responses to society. Throughout the film I felt emotions of pain for her and relating to some similar experiences she had for example people staring at her because she looked different and feeling awkward ( of not knowing how to respond) to different situations.
I believe watching the film will help professionals and adults and parents realize “some of the experiences children have growing up.” I want to envision ( As I learned through this film about racism stereotypes) turning future learning opportunities with children of diverse backgrounds and families as equals as much as possible. Bringing a sense that we are all human beings first. ( Men and women) (children are all children first) and the thought of respecting differences is key for a better society. I keep in mind children learn about their identity and about society really early in life.
After watching the film ( contributing to this assignment) I believe it diminishes equity because people were not accepting of the fact that the child belonged and was born into a family. Society was looking at skin color instead of the child and considering the child's emotions and responses to society. Throughout the film I felt emotions of pain for her and relating to some similar experiences she had for example people staring at her because she looked different and feeling awkward ( of not knowing how to respond) to different situations.
I believe watching the film will help professionals and adults and parents realize “some of the experiences children have growing up.” I want to envision ( As I learned through this film about racism stereotypes) turning future learning opportunities with children of diverse backgrounds and families as equals as much as possible. Bringing a sense that we are all human beings first. ( Men and women) (children are all children first) and the thought of respecting differences is key for a better society. I keep in mind children learn about their identity and about society really early in life.
I recommend this movie (If you have time to watch it) to any adult, colleague looking for
better understanding of racism and microagression, Although the rating is PG-13
I strongly suggest to stick to the rating as far as ages of children and encouraging
parents to watch the movie along with their teens and discuss situations. Below is a link to another video of a short behind the scenes look at the actors discussing the concept of the movie.
Reference/link
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





